Econometrica

Journal Of The Econometric Society

An International Society for the Advancement of Economic
Theory in its Relation to Statistics and Mathematics

Edited by: Guido W. Imbens • Print ISSN: 0012-9682 • Online ISSN: 1468-0262

Econometrica: Nov, 2024, Volume 92, Issue 6

Aggregate Implications of Barriers to Female Entrepreneurship

https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20396
p. 1801-1835

Gaurav Chiplunkar|Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg

We develop a framework for quantifying barriers to labor force participation (LFP) and entrepreneurship faced by women in India. We find substantial barriers to LFP, and higher costs of expanding businesses through hiring workers for women entrepreneurs. However, there is one area where female entrepreneurs have an advantage: the hiring of female workers. We show that this is not driven by the sectoral composition of female employment. Consistent with this pattern, policies promoting female entrepreneurship can significantly increase female LFP even without explicitly targeting female LFP. Counterfactual simulations indicate that removing all excess barriers faced by women entrepreneurs would substantially increase the fraction of female‐owned firms, female LFP, earnings, and generate substantial gains for the economy. These gains are due to higher LFP, higher real wages and profits, and reallocation: low productivity male‐owned firms previously sheltered from female competition are replaced by higher productivity female‐owned firms previously excluded from the economy.


Log In To View Full Content

Supplemental Material

Supplement to "Aggregate Implications Of Barriers To Female Entrepreneurship"

Gaurav Chiplunkar and Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg

This supplement contains material not found within the manuscript.

Supplement to "Aggregate Implications Of Barriers To Female Entrepreneurship"

Gaurav Chiplunkar and Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg

The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13315159. The authors were granted an exemption to publish parts of their data because either access to these data is restricted or the authors do not have the right to republish them. Therefore, the replication package only includes the codes and the parts of the data that are not subject to the exemption. However, the authors provided the Journal with (or assisted the Journal to obtain) temporary access to the restricted data. The Journal checked the provided and restricted data and the codes for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices.